Thursday, May 11, 2006


Abstinence Education A Farce

The conservative Christians© are able to make an enormous fuss about sex: who has it and who shouldn’t have it. They’ve been able to make “Abstinence Education” a part of the national agenda on sex education, close down abortion clinics, restrict women’s choices about their own bodies, and in general make themselves into a major nuisance.

The Abstinence-pushers have managed to acquire almost $170 million to spread their programs, courtesy of various politicians, including the last two presidents.

What’s bad is this: the programs don’t work. Our teen-age pregnancy rate is nine times greater than that of the Netherlands, double that of Canada. Our rate of teen-age abortions is twice that of France. All of these countries freely dispense contraceptives and the morning-after pills without interference from churches.

The corollary to this is that America’s infant mortality rate is also much higher than in other industrialized, “modern” societies.

It’s all pretty disgusting.

Sharon Smith: 'Abstinence backfires'
Date: Thursday, May 11 @ 10:02:08 EDT
Topic: The Religious Right

No, No, No ... Yes, Yes, YES!

Sharon Smith, CounterPunch

One of the Christian Right's most cherished ideological victories since the 1990s has been the dominance of federally funded "abstinence only until marriage" programs now taught to millions of teenagers across the country.

New evidence, however, suggests that these same programs have contributed to soaring rates of unplanned pregnancies, out-of-wedlock births and, yes, abortions among women who are young or poor.

Abstinence education was not an invention of the Bush administration but was quietly tucked into Clinton's 1996 welfare reform bill-dangling federal grants for abstinence-only programs to cash-starved states-funded with $97 million in 1999 and rising to nearly $170 million last year.

Ironically, teenage contraceptive use had nearly doubled during the Reagan era, when comprehensive sex education-including contraception instruction-still remained the norm.

In contrast, U.S. law now requires federally funded sexuality education to inform teenagers that "sexual activity outside the context of [monogamous and heterosexual] marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects."

These programs do not let the facts stand in the way of traumatizing teenagers from developing a remotely healthy attitude toward their own sexuality.

As the Washington Post reported in 2004, "Many American youngsters participating in federally funded abstinence-only programs have been taught [falsely] over the past three years that abortion can lead to sterility and suicide, that half the gay male teenagers in the United States have tested positive for the AIDS virus, and that touching a person's genitals 'can result in pregnancy.'"

A Congressional study in 2004 discovered that the curricula used by 69 educational organizations in 25 states taught adolescents that a 43-day-old fetus is a "thinking person" and that the HIV virus can be spread by sweat or tears.

In addition, abstinence-only programs universally neglect to teach teenagers to use contraception, instead emphasizing false accusations about contraceptive failure. The Congressional study found, for example, that many abstinence programs claimed condoms fail to prevent HIV transmission as often as 31 percent of the time, when the actual statistic is just 3 percent.

Not surprisingly, abstinence promotion has not decreased teen sexual activity but has led to an increase in unprotected sex. A recent Columbia University study found that 88 percent of teenage girls who take "virginity pledges" eventually have premarital sex-but are one-third less likely to use contraception when they do so.

At least two-thirds of American teenage females have had sex by the time they reach the age of 18, according to the Center for Disease Control. In any given year, nine in ten teenagers who have heterosexual sex without contraceptives become pregnant.

Nearly 80 percent of U.S. teen births take place outside of wedlock-overwhelmingly to low-income women, while one in four sexually active teens acquires a sexually transmitted disease.

Federal funding for contraception has declined by 59 percent (in constant dollars) since 1980. As a result, women living in poverty are almost four times more likely to become pregnant unintentionally than women of even moderate means.

According to reproductive rights researchers from the Alan Guttmacher institute, the rate of unplanned pregnancy rose by nearly 30 percent for women living below the federal poverty line between 1994 through 2001-while falling by 20 percent during the same time period for women in families earning just $16,000 annually for a family of three.

Among the poorest women, the proportion of unwanted pregnancies that resulted in live births increased by almost 50 percent between 1994 and 2001, while it declined for women in families whose income was at least twice the official poverty level.

Unintended pregnancies led to almost even numbers of births and abortions.

U.S. teen pregnancy rates are double those in England and Canada, and nine times more than those in the Netherlands and Japan.

Research shows that when contraception is readily available, the rate of unplanned pregnancy drops. France offers free emergency contraception to teenagers, without requiring them to inform their parents, yet France has an abortion rate half of that in the U.S.

For the record, no scientific evidence exists to show that consensual sex between teenagers is harmful in any respect.

Sharon Smith is the author of Women and Socialism and Subterranean Fire: a History of Working-Class Radicalism in the United States. She can be reached at:

Source: CounterPunch

The URL for this story is:

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?