Thursday, July 27, 2006
Even Andrew Sullivan Gives Up On Rummy
I generally regard Andrew Sullivan as a rather prissy stooge. I don’t understand how he deals with the contradictions between himself and his party-of-choice. But, that’s really not my problem. I admit the times I’ve seen him on Bill Maher’s TV programs I’ve enjoyed him; he does seem to be a good sport.
And this piece, on Rumsfeld’s insulting, stupid, and deranged behavior toward the Israeli-Jordanian War, is very astute. Rummy is, well, it's like he's rummy.
Andrew Sullivan.
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
The Glibness of Rumsfeld
http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/07/the_glibness_of.html?promoid=rss_daily_dish
26 Jul 2006 12:42 pm
His detachment from his own responsibility is breathtaking. The glibness with which he describes tha mass slaughter of innocents in a country whose security he is responsible for is astonishing. Check this transcript out. Money quote:
Q: Is the country closer to a civil war?
SEC. RUMSFELD: Oh, I don't know. You know, I thought about that last night, and just musing over the words, the phrase, and what constitutes it. If you think of our Civil War, this is really very different. If you think of civil wars in other countries, this is really quite different. There is - there is a good deal of violence in Baghdad and two or three other provinces, and yet in 14 other provinces there's very little violence or numbers of incidents. So it's a - it's a highly concentrated thing. It clearly is being stimulated by people who would like to have what could be characterized as a civil war and win it, but I'm not going to be the one to decide if, when or at all.
His relevance to allowing this to happen is as overwhelming as his irrelevance is today. He's treating one of the biggest military fiascoes in recent history as something to debate at night, the way one would discuss the merits of an interesting movie. Greg Djerejian comments here. The man is a disgrace. (snipped)
And this piece, on Rumsfeld’s insulting, stupid, and deranged behavior toward the Israeli-Jordanian War, is very astute. Rummy is, well, it's like he's rummy.
Andrew Sullivan.
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
The Glibness of Rumsfeld
http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/07/the_glibness_of.html?promoid=rss_daily_dish
26 Jul 2006 12:42 pm
His detachment from his own responsibility is breathtaking. The glibness with which he describes tha mass slaughter of innocents in a country whose security he is responsible for is astonishing. Check this transcript out. Money quote:
Q: Is the country closer to a civil war?
SEC. RUMSFELD: Oh, I don't know. You know, I thought about that last night, and just musing over the words, the phrase, and what constitutes it. If you think of our Civil War, this is really very different. If you think of civil wars in other countries, this is really quite different. There is - there is a good deal of violence in Baghdad and two or three other provinces, and yet in 14 other provinces there's very little violence or numbers of incidents. So it's a - it's a highly concentrated thing. It clearly is being stimulated by people who would like to have what could be characterized as a civil war and win it, but I'm not going to be the one to decide if, when or at all.
His relevance to allowing this to happen is as overwhelming as his irrelevance is today. He's treating one of the biggest military fiascoes in recent history as something to debate at night, the way one would discuss the merits of an interesting movie. Greg Djerejian comments here. The man is a disgrace. (snipped)
